BACKGROUND AND POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS
 |
AMISOM Humanitarian activities |
|
Humanitarian activities have made AMISOM very popular among the local Somalis |
| |
| |

1.
In 1978, instability became an
increasing phenomenon in Somalia
culminating into civil strife and
the collapse of central authority
with the overthrow of the dictatorial
regime of President Siad Barre on
26 January 1991. Unable to agree
on a national political formula,
the country entered into a period
of intensive civil war and statelessness
that disrupted the social, political
and economic fabric of the Somali
Republic. A large number of small
arms and heavy weapons commonly
called ‘technical’ fell
into the hands of civilians who
formed organized and freelance militias
to replace the national defence
and police forces. Atrocities committed
include human rights abuse, indiscriminate
killing of civilians, widespread
rape and violence against women
and children, arbitrary detention,
forced recruitment and use of child
soldiers among others.
2. A United States-led humanitarian
and nation-building intervention
under the auspices of the UN (the
Unified Task Force, UNITAF) was
initiated in 1993, but was withdrawn
in 1995 after a firefight in Mogadishu
resulted in US troop casualties.
The preceding UN Peacekeeping Operation
in Somalia, UNOSOM I and II also
withdrew in March 1995. In the aftermath
of these separate missions, warlords
continued to ravage Mogadishu and
other parts of Somalia.
3. The Warlords who were operating
in Mogadishu after the withdrawal
of UNOSOM II were finally defeated
by an alliance of Islamic Courts,
civil society groups, business community
and the general population of Mogadishu
early 2006. While some of the warlords
were alleged to have sought refuge
in the neighbouring countries, others
were believed to be hiding in other
parts of Somalia. Their whereabouts
and intentions remain unclear. In
the meantime, the Islamic Courts
consolidated power and control over
Mogadishu, through the establishment
of committees and created more courts
to form the Islamic Courts Union
(ICU). The ICU quickly spread its
control over most parts of the country
through conquest and intimidation.
4. The ICU’s roots can be
traced to its current radical leader,
Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys, a retired
Somali Armed Force Colonel, who
went about after 1977, establishing
Islamic Courts that provided harsh
order to Somalia’s anarchic
political landscape. Aweys was appointed
the Secretary General of the Sharia
Implementation Council, a group
dedicated to unifying Islamic courts
under one body and governing Somalia
under Islamic law. At the formation
of the Islamic Courts Council in
2000 and the merging of independent
courts in south Mogadishu, Aweys
became the council’s Secretary
General. The merger of the courts’
militias raised the largest force
in Mogadishu to fight the warlords.
5. After several failed attempts
at building a new Somali Unity Government,
a two-year peace process, led by
the Government of Kenya, under the
auspices of the Intergovernmental
Authority for Development (IGAD),
concluded in October 2004 with the
election of Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmed
as the Transitional Federal President
of Somalia. The process also led
the formation of a Transitional
Federal Government (TFG) and Transitional
Federal Institutions (TFIs), which
up to June 2004, operated from Nairobi.
6. The TFG, since its relocation
to Somalia after June 2004, moved
its temporal headquarters to Jowhar
and thereafter to Baidoa in the
Bay Region. The TFG and the TFIs
gained broad acceptance and recognition
by Somalis and made considerable
progress in the areas of political
institutionalization, especially
the establishment and approval of
the National Reconciliation Council,
NSSP, as well as establishment of
the Supreme Court, and regional
and district councils. However,
further progress was hampered by
lack of institutional capacity and
inadequate resources and external
assistance to the TFIs. This situation
has affected the establishment of
the new security forces in accordance
with the provisions of the NSSP.
It was also not possible for the
TFG to reach out to and establish
its control over all sections and
regions of the Somali society, though
it has support from those regions.
Regional and local governing bodies,
based on clan lines, each with its
own security system, therefore continued
to control various cities and regions
in the country. Most significant
of these were the warlords that
controlled and terrorized inhabitants
of Mogadishu.
7. The situation in Somalia changed
drastically from what it was when
the TFG was formed. The ICU emerged
as a major player in Somali politics
alongside the TFG, establishing
itself as the new reality that controlled
Mogadishu and increasing its sphere
of influence to other areas thus
effectively besieging the TFG in
the small enclave of Baidoa. The
ICU did not accord with the provisions
of the Transitional Federal Charter
but sought to create a political
authority in Somalia, based on the
Sharia law.
8. The TFG and the ICU expressed
their commitment to dialogue and
reconciliation, and declared their
readiness to participate in peace
talks. In this regard, the parties
expressed their readiness to discuss
all political and security issues,
including the new situation in Mogadishu,
and called for the full support
of all stakeholders to ensure the
success of the talks. Two rounds
of peace talks which took place
in Khartoum, Sudan, under the auspices
of the League of Arab States did
not yield the desired results and
the third round failed to take off
due to opposing uncompromising positions
adopted by both parties.
9. The situation of the TFG was
further weakened by the disagreement
between the Prime Minister Mr. Ali
Mohamed Ghedi and his ministers
(TFG) over whether to dialogue with
the ICU or not. Failed attempts
to pass a vote of no confidence
in the Prime Minister led to a spate
of mass resignations of ministers
and Deputy Ministers from the Government.
Consequently, the TFG Cabinet was
dissolved and new Ministers appointed
in August 2006.
10. Perceived interferences by some
frontline states in the Somali Peace
Process, contributed to unnecessary
tension and mistrust between the
TFG and the ICU. Both sides claim
the involvement of external players
and countries in providing military
and other support to one side or
the other. While the TFG claims
that there are international terrorist
within the ICU with support from
some countries including Eritrea;
the ICU on the other hand alleges
the deployment of Ethiopian forces
is in support of the TFG.
11. The UN Security Council Resolution
1725, adopted on 6th December 2006
as attached as Enclsosure 1, partially
lifted the arms embargo and authorized
the AU and IGAD member states to
establish a training and protection
mission in Somalia. However, the
two bodies were not able to deploy
this force before forces loyal to
the TFG and supported by Ethiopian
troops launched a massive offensive
against the ICU forces on 25th December
and effectively dislodged them from
all their strongholds by 1st January
2006. After the defeat of the ICU,
some of their fighters abandoned
their uniforms and rejoined their
clans while others withdrew towards
the Kenyan border. The ICU undertook
to launch guerrilla attacks against
the Ethiopian troops within Somalia
and elsewhere until they withdrew
from the country.
12. Concurrently, as the international
community called on Ethiopia to
withdraw its troops from Somalia
it also recognized the fact that
Somalia will relapse into a state
of anarchy without a strong force
replacing the Ethiopians to assist
the TFG consolidate its position.
This situation therefore reinforced
the call on AU and IGAD to deploy
a force to Somalia. However due
to restrictions placed on the frontline
states to intervene in Somalia as
well as other administrative problems
inherent in the arrangement it become
necessary to review the original
plan of deploying an IGAD force
that will hand over to the AU within
6 months. A decision was therefore
taken to deploy an AU Force that
incorporated elements from IGAD
to be called African Union Mission
in Somalia (AMISOM). Consequently,
the PSC, at its 69th Meeting held
in Addis Ababa on 19th January 2007
mandated the AU Commission to establish
a Peace Support Mission in Somalia.
The PSC Communiqué is attached
as Enclsosure 2.
POLITICAL
DEVELOPMENTS AND DECISIONS
13. In light of the worsening security
situation in Somalia, the Government
of Somalia and the Heads of State
of the Intergovernmental Authority
for Development (IGAD) issued a
communiqué on the 31 January
2005 meeting in Abuja, Nigeria,
on their intentions to deploy a
Peace Support Mission to Somalia.
The communiqué as attached
as Enclsosure 3 provided for security
support to the Transitional Federal
Government (TFG) in order to ensure
its relocation to Somalia, guarantee
the sustenance of the outcome of
the IGAD Peace Process and assist
with the re-establishment of peace
and security including training
of the Police and the Army. The
intentions of this communiqué
were endorsed by the Fourth Ordinary
Session of the African Union and
authorized by subsequent decision
of the 24th Meeting of the Peace
and Security Council (PSC) of the
African Union held on 7 February
2005 (Enclsosure 4).
14. On 14 February 2005 the AU/IGAD
sent a first Fact-Finding and Reconnaissance
Mission on to determine the mandate,
force size, structure and tasks
of the Peace Support Mission. The
proposed IGAD Forces for Somalia
(IGASOM) Deployment Plan was presented
by the Military Experts from the
IGAD Member States, refined by the
Chiefs of Defence and finally approved
by the Ministers of Defence at the
14 March 2005 meeting in Entebbe,
Uganda. The IGASOM Deployment Plan
as attached Enclsosure E was subsequently
adopted at the 24th IGAD Council
of Ministers on 18 March 2005, in
Nairobi, Kenya. Nevertheless, the
IGASOM deployment did not take place
in light of extant difficulties
which were mainly due to the UN
Security Council’s inability
to lift the arms embargo on Somalia.
Hence a request was made for a Joint
AU/IGAD Planning Team and the Somali
National Security and Stabilization
Plan for the deployment of forces
to Somalia.
15. On 20 March 2006, the 11th IGAD
Summit of Heads of State and Government
held in Nairobi reiterated its decision
to deploy IGASOM. Subsequently an
Extra-Ordinary Council of Ministers
Meeting on 13th June 2006 in Nairobi
reaffirmed the need for deployment
of IGASOM.
16. On 5 July 2006 a second AU/IGAD
mission to Somalia undertook political
and technical consultations with
the TFG, the Islamic Courts Union
(ICU), the Business Community, Civil
Society and Traditional Leaders
in order to finalise the modalities
for deployment of forces to Somalia.
Subsequently, on 1 August 2006,
an Extra-Ordinary Council of Ministers’
Meeting in Nairobi directed the
Chiefs of Defence Staff of IGAD
to prepare a revised Detailed Mission
Plan based on the situation in Somalia
and in accordance with the Somali
National Security Stabilization
Plan.